Idaho Press-Tribune

 
default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
Not you?||
Logout|My Dashboard

Idaho pre-abortion ultrasound debate heats up

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Thursday, March 8, 2012 12:19 am | Updated: 12:25 am, Thu Mar 8, 2012.

© 2012 Idaho Press-Tribune

BOISE — A proposed bill that would amend existing state abortion laws to require women seeking the procedure to first undergo an ultrasound is causing controversy as it makes its way through the Idaho Legislature.

According to SB 1349, women would not be required to view the ultrasound image, but doctors and patients would both need to sign a statement verifying that the ultrasound was administered prior to the abortion procedure.

The ACLU of Idaho, Planned Parenthood Votes Northwest and United Action of Idaho are holding a protest of the bill on the Statehouse steps at noon today. In a statement, the groups said they have been “inundated” with phone calls and emails regarding the bill, and are deeply concerned about its consequences.

Sponsors of SB 1349 said the purpose is to give women the opportunity to make an informed decision by providing them with more information before going through with an abortion, and it is not intended to sway them from having an abortion.

According to the bill’s statement of purpose, SB 1349 would add to the information already provided to expectant mothers as required by Idaho Code by including a list of places where women can obtain an ultrasound free of charge.   

The bill states, with the exception of a medical emergency, women who are considering an abortion would first receive printed information 24-hours prior to a scheduled abortion about services available to them from pregnancy through childbirth and child care. They would also receive photos and information about normal fetus development and descriptions of abortion procedures currently available, as well as risks associated with them

Prior to the abortion procedure, the patient would then receive an ultrasound “using whichever method the physician and patient agree is best under the circumstances.” Following the ultrasound, doctors and patients would initial and sign a statement that includes the gestational age and the heart rate of the fetus if available, and would also indicate whether or not the patient chose to view the image, listen to the heart beat, and accepted a physical image of the ultrasound.

The bill does not prohibit a woman from going through with the abortion following the ultrasound.

A similar bill in Virginia caused nationwide controversy over a requirement that women receive more invasive transvaginal ultrasounds, because abdominal ultrasounds would not produce a clear enough picture during the earliest stages of a pregnancy.

The Virginia bill was amended to exclude that requirement and was signed into law Wednesday by Virginia Gov. Bob McConnell.

The Idaho bill does not require that type of ultrasound, but leaves it up to the patient and physician to determine the type of ultrasound.

© 2015 Idaho Press-Tribune. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Check out these other popular articles

IdahoPress.com invites you to take part in the community conversation. But those who don't play nice may be uninvited. Don't post comments that are off topic, defamatory, libelous, obscene, racist, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. We may remove any comment for any reason or no reason. We encourage you to report abuse, but the decision to delete is ours. Commenters have no expectation of privacy and may be held accountable for their comments.
Comments are opinions of the author only, and do not reflect the opinions or views of Idaho Press-Tribune. Please view our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy for further details...

Welcome to the discussion.

5 comments:

  • Spudmans1 posted at 1:04 pm on Thu, Mar 8, 2012.

    Spudmans1 Posts: 213

    Human murder is a crime. The gov't will prosecute you if you are caught after committing one. The jury is still out on whether or not a baby in their mother's womb is a life or a bunch of fetal mass. So what's the big deal? A woman who elects to terminate a child prior to birth goes through an extremely invasive procedure, correct? An ultrasound is not invasive however it is very informative and the host may think twice about her following through with it once she sees and hears the miracle of life inside her. A woman still has every right to be "pro-death" (let's call a spade a spade here & not sugar coat it by simply labeling it a choice) as nobody is stopping her. What it does do is provide information for a more informed decision. Like jumping off of a cliff, just because you can, doesn't mean you will. Many times after the host did terminate they have to deal with the physical ( maybe in one instance, if something goes wrong during the termination procedure and they become sterile) damage. Secondly, the emotional carnage immediately and later on in life. If a mother does happen to lose a child or children do not think for even a second that they will not grieve greatly for the child that was never even allowed to see their 1st birthday. That lingering memory can & has crushed many a person's whole sense of purpose & meaning of their own life. Again - as a former fetus, I thank my mother for choosing life. Really, really.

     
  • GhostTown posted at 9:35 am on Thu, Mar 8, 2012.

    GhostTown Posts: 5

    "Again - The Governement has no place in the doctor's office with a patient. "


    I absolutely agree with this.

     
  • idahocrystal posted at 8:01 am on Thu, Mar 8, 2012.

    idahocrystal Posts: 31

    Again - The Governement has no place in the doctor's office with a patient.

     
  • rp1020 posted at 7:59 am on Thu, Mar 8, 2012.

    rp1020 Posts: 36

    Our "Big Government" conservatives are at it again! They're anti-conception, anti-choice and "pro-life" from pre-conception until birth. After birth, children are abandoned by these "do-gooders".

     
  • Candid1960 posted at 7:21 am on Thu, Mar 8, 2012.

    Candid1960 Posts: 56

    "If it is not a baby, you aren't pregnant."

     
loading...
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT