Another jail bond vote?
mbutts@idahopress.com
Thursday, November 5th, 2009
CANYON COUNTY — The day after Canyon County's bond election for a new jail fell short of the two-thirds supermajority needed to pass, county commissioners discussed conducting another jail bond election in May.
Commissioner Steve Rule said Wednesday that Gem County ran a jail bond election about eight times before it passed and the county built a new jail earlier this decade. Canyon County has now had two jail bond elections since 2006. Both got a majority of the vote but did not pass.
Tuesday 57.72 percent of voters approved of the $46 million jail bond.
County jail background
The county jail has been overcrowded for years. The American Civil Liberties Union of Idaho filed a lawsuit against the county this year because of poor conditions in the jail. The ACLU asked the county for $193,000 in attorney fees after the two parties reached an agreement in the lawsuit in August. But the county has disputed that figure. A third-party monitor will now periodically inspect the jail to see if the county is complying with a consent decree the county agreed to follow to resolve the lawsuit.
Related Articles
"We haven't solved any problems yet" with the jail, Rule said Wednesday. "We're right back at the beginning."
The county could also ask a judge to approve a bond for building a new jail. But Rule and Commissioner Kathy Alder did not like that option because of the difficulty of getting judicial approval for such a project.
Tuesday's election cost the county an as-yet determined amount of money. That's because some parts of the county did not conduct city elections and had to conduct voting only for the bond.
A jail bond election on the May 25 primary day would cost the county only a few hundred dollars for extra ballot printing, County Clerk Bill Hurst said, and the cost of bond counsel.
The county can still use $18.5 million in federal economic stimulus funds to help build a new jail through 2010. And any jail bond election would have to take place six months and one day after the previous jail bond election. The county has one more chance to conduct a bond election for a project that could use that money, Rule said.
When county voters understood how much the bond would cost and how building a new jail now rather than later could save taxpayer money, they voted for the new jail, Alder and Rule said. The bond would have cost property owners with property assessed at $200,000 an estimated $32.94 a year more in taxes.
"When they learned about the savings they flip-flopped right in front of us and said they would vote for the bond," Rule said.
But opponents of the bond said it was the wrong time to raise taxes and questioned the urgency of the need for a new jail.
Alder said she appreciated everyone who voted in the election whether they voted for the bond or against it. She said the county could not "drop the ball" in its efforts to get a bond passed and a new jail built.
In 2006, 56 percent of voters approved the new jail bond compared to Tuesday's 57.72 percent.
"I feel quite positive because we didn't lose votes, we gained a percent," Alder said.
The county's plan for a new jail is as inexpensive as it can be, Rule said.
"I don't know how we can take this design and make it cheaper without making it smaller," Rule said, "and that's not going to solve the problem."
County officials have already obtained land northwest of Caldwell where they want to build the new jail.








