Give Me Liberty
This blog is hosted by the Idaho Press-Tribune; the opinions and content provided here are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the Idaho Press-Tribune.
Welcome GuestLog in  Register
Online: 0 members and 130 guests.
Keyword 
Adam Graham
Tuesday, August 11, 2009 - 12:20 am

A favorite philosophical question often asked is, "Why does your average teacher earn a little more than one percent of what Alex Rodriguez does in a year?" There's a simple market-based explanation for this. Alex Rodriguez can play the game of baseball like few other people and his services come at a premium in a free market.

However, Alex Rodriguez would earn far less if only the Major League Players were represented by the National Education Association and they applied the same principles of labor to the Major Leagues that they do to education.

Every baseball player would be paid based on a union scale of what a shortstop, third basemen, pitcher or second basemen was supposed to make based on their years of experience in the major leagues without regard to performance. If you proposed to give a player a bonus for making the all-star team or hitting fifty homers, you'd be denigrated for discouraging teamwork and not recognizing that because of their ballparks, players behind them in the batting order, and even factors such as height and natural hitting talent, not every player could achieve these goals, so the incentive would be unfair.

By this same standard, unions would protect players, managers, and even GMs from retribution for a team having a losing season. After all, there are a lot of factors that can't be controlled by any single individual that can affect wins and losses.

In addition to this, we would have baseball tenure, which means that after a few years in the major leagues, you could not get rid of a player who couldn't hit, couldn't field, and showed no interest in making an effort at a job where there was no reward for excellence and no risk for failure.

We'd create a game full of .250 hitters because we would no longer reward excellence. Top players who could switch sports or play overseas would. Fans would refuse to tolerate it. They would turn away in disgust from a system that rewarded mediocrity.

If we wouldn't take this from a major sport, why do we accept it from the people who are sent billions of dollars to educate America's children?

Teachers should be paid like Alex Rodriguez. On the merit of their abilities. This must happen for America to have a Major League Education system.

Bookmark and Share

Comments:

Your analogy doesn't hold up. The performance of major league baseball players depends on natural ability and how hard they train. They use standard equipment and play in standard baseball parks. A baseball player is only responsible for how he himself performs, so there really are only a few factors that he needs to focus on. The manager and coaches, on the other hand, are more like teachers. They cannot go out and play the game as they know it needs to be played-they depend on their players to perform as they have been taught. By the way, how do managers' and coaches' pay compare to their players' salaries? Even that comparison is not quite right, because a person who has never played baseball before, or who played soccer on his last team, or one who is missing a leg or an arm, would never be put on a major league baseball team. Imagine what the manager would say if he were told that this new player would be starting the next game, and that he had better be playing as well as the other players by the end of the season, or else! Baseball players desire to do well, and usually are encouraged by their families and friends. Many students, on the other hand, are not motivated, or have learning difficulties. Many are not encouraged or helped by their families. Many come to school tired because they had to take care of younger siblings, or their parents were fighting last night, or their mom was busted for possession of meth. Teachers want and try to teach all of these students, but often they cannot learn until the underlying issues are dealt with. Yes, a really good teacher will help them learn, but the learning will not always be reflected in test scores (or batting averages, for that matter). So, Mr. Graham, please do not compare teaching to a game. The stakes are so much higher. And by the way, I think Mr. Beagarie has a point. Maybe teachers should hire the players' union to represent them next year!
amused - 4:52 PM, Tuesday August 18, 2009
If there was a free market system for education you would see teachers that warrant a greater reward receive it based on their popularity in providing valuable results. Teachers that don't provide value to parents would be looking for another job. How much money would you pay to have your child being taught by Aristotle or some other great educator? There would be great value in that and the demand would far exceed the supply. Our current public school system is nothing but a daycare center. So how much do you pay for daycare?
Robert Barry - 4:04 PM, Monday August 17, 2009
Do you mean to say that we could pay our teachers $25 million per year if they so merit? And how about Major League Baseball Player Association strikes? Professional baseball players did not get those high wages without union representation.
Claudio Beagarie - 11:51 AM, Wednesday August 12, 2009


If you Log in or Register you will not be required to fill this out each time you comment.
Name:
Email Address: Will not be published.
Comment [max. 5000 chars.] Character Count:

Adam Graham is a writer and blogger living in Boise. He can be reached at adam@adamsweb.us. Read Adam's introduction to learn more about him.

IPT Community Calendar
<< >>
SMTWTFS
01020304050607
08091011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930          
Submit your event - FREE!
Blog Admin login
Username:
Password: